Derren Brown: Archive

Bookmark and Share

Message ID: 03008[ Previous ]    [ Next ]    [ Up Thread ]

From: designforlife
Date: Mon Mar 3, 2003 12:57pm
Subject: No emoticon for what I am feeling...

--- In a previous message Mike Vizard wrote:
> Well Said June,
> Orientation really does have nothing to do with anything Derren has
done.
> Even if he was(And i think that has nothing to do with anyone of
us) what
> business is it of anyone's to even suggest it, especially on such a
forum.

If you're suggesting that suggesting someone is gay is a bad thing,
then, logically, I would have to suggest that you don't like gay
people. Now, I know that's probably not true, so I WON'T suggest
that, instead I will politely suggest that you remain calm and stop
trying to censor people's conversations.

> This is the kind of thing the worlds best in gutter press(British
> newspapers)love to read and then spread everywhere serving only to
damage
> many a performers career

Damage it how? By making homophobes not watch their shows? Boo-hoo.
What a ridiculous suggestion. Britain truly is a country of repressed
curtain-twitchers, if this comment is any representation of fact.

Besides, eagle-eyed readers may have noted that most of the posts
were dedicated to demonstrating how Derren is not actually gay - so
you can all breathe a sigh of relief that his career has not
been "damaged".

> So lets give it a rest and not continue down this line of
conversation.
> It's relevance to anything or anyone is beyond me.

It's not relevant, true, it's none of my business, true, it's a
personal matter, ALL TRUE, but that's not the point. It's not illegal
or immoral to discuss it and you will have to live with that,
unfortunately. This is the internet, not the letters page of the
Daily Mail and even if it were, I doubt they would be so censorious.

I don't remember anyone getting up in arms when there was discussion
of Derren's supposed new girlfriend, either. One kind of speculation
acceptable and another not? I can only assume that it's the subject
matter that offends. Put your reply in the context of the much
earlier discussion of Sue the Psychologist (the supposed girlfriend)
and you'll see how po-faced and hysterical it sounds.

Apologies for ranting but I feel strongly about this issue, did you
guess?

RepliesAuthorYahoo! IDDateSize
3009: Re: No emoticon for what I am feeling...sue5804sue5804Mon 03/03/20034 KB
3025: Re: No emoticon for what I am feeling...dan_peterson2dan_peterson2Mon 03/03/20034 KB
3027: Re: No emoticon for what I am feeling...trentretrotrentretroMon 03/03/20035 KB
3028: Re: No emoticon for what I am feeling...luise_fluise_fMon 03/03/20035 KB
3031: Re: No emoticon for what I am feeling...luscious_lita_uk_4uluscious_lita_uk_4uMon 03/03/20035 KB
3042: Re: No emoticon for what I am feeling...hypersanghypersangMon 03/03/20032 KB
3082: Re: No emoticon for what I am feeling...designforlifedesignforlifeWed 05/03/20033 KB
3086: Re: No emoticon for what I am feeling...sue5804sue5804Wed 05/03/20033 KB
3043: Re: No emoticon for what I am feeling...Mike Vizardvizardm1972Mon 03/03/20037 KB

site design, layout and contents © 2003-2024 Richard Shakeshaft, unless otherwise attributed
Richard Shakeshaft is a participant in the Amazon EU Associates Programme, an affiliate advertising programme designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees
by advertising and linking to Amazon.co.uk