Message ID: 04468 | [ Previous ] [ Next ] [ Up Thread ] |
From: novembertuesday
Date: Sun Apr 13, 2003 7:13pm
Subject: Re: Vampires etc
lol, despite the fact I never mentioned the books, only the
adaptations... ;o)
I have some of Rice's books which are not bad at all, though for
higher blood spatter content I prefer Poppy Z Brite. Erm... as if
y'all needed to know!
Contact lenses: I find the red ones a bit too much. The cats-eye
style ones are pretty good, or violet.
Though I can't wear them now, too much crying involved - overly
sensitive eyes!
8^)
Em
>From: killerb_0187
>Date: Sat Apr 12, 2003 3:58 pm
>Subject: Re: Vampires etc
>I've always loved to have red eyes, ever since I was a kid...
Don't
>wear the contacts anymore though, I get too much attention:
Good and
>Bad!
--- In a previous message, Kirsty Smith
wrote:
> LMAO!!Ok, no Im not justifying Tom Cruise in the slightest!!!! Just
the Anne Rice books, thats all I condone!
>
> "novembertuesday
wrote:*sigh* No respect for the classics these days... ;o)
>
> But Tom Cruise?! Sorry, you'll never convince me. Have to agree
to
> differ on that one!
>
> lol
>
> Em
> --- In a previous message, Kirsty Smith
> wrote:
> >
> > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion but in mine, thats
> OVERacting rather than screen presence!
> > "novembertuesday
> wrote:Anne Rice adaptations? Tsk. You want proper Vamps, head back
> to the
> > first Christopher Lee/Dracula film. Now that's screen
presence.
> >
> > Not sure about those red contact lenses, though...
> >
> > Em
> >
Replies | Author | Yahoo! ID | Date | Size |
4484: Re: Vampires etc | Kirsty Smith | ksasmith | Mon 14/04/2003 | 4 KB |
4608: Re: Vampires etc | killerb_0187 | killerb_0187 | Sat 19/04/2003 | 4 KB |