Derren Brown: Archive
| Message ID: 04027 | [ Previous ] [ Next ] [ Up Thread ] |
From: killerb_0187
Date: Wed Apr 2, 2003 2:52pm
Subject: [Derren Brown] Re: INDUCE....Ouch then urghh
--- In a previous message Blue Chip
wrote:
> Okay, let's get somthing straight:
>
> We read that article for CALM-DOWN-NOW PURPOSES. If people
> can't read they will not know of your problem.
>
> Secondly, I successfully tried what you wrote on others!! Now,
> unless I sent them to their graves... I got it right first time.
>
> [I would like to add that I was in the presence of
> a 65yr old, 5th Dan, Jujitsu Sensai when I tried it]
>
> /me phones sparing partner.... "hello?" yep, he's still there! :)
>
> So can killers just take it easy. It's not like people started to
> question your ethics!
LOL, are you kidding me?
If people want to criticise constructively then that's fine, I have
no problem with that. After all, that's what this group has always
been about.
>
> Milgram* possibly got it wrong a few times before his brilliant
results.
> In the history of psychology many have died from lack of
obedience+. Now if
> people want to question ethics, then they might like to stick their
> neck out and say "I bet you did that on purpose". The end.
I don't think I quite understand what you mean here.
>
> * I have to say that I actually have no idea who "Milgram" is
<shrugs>
> + cite: Josep Mengler (guessed as spelling)
No, I have no idea who "Mengler" is either.
>
> Additionally:
> # Nobody has stated anything about you personally or of your direct
> intentions - prove me wrong.
Well, no, not personal, but what I write still constitutes me,
whether it's a personal comment or not.
> # The method you revealed *IS* dangerous - maybe you could mention
it in
> passing next time you are at the doctors and see what (s)he says?
Again, as I've said a million times EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. Now why BC
would I say that? Because it's unethical? NO, because it IS DANGEROUS
when not done properly.
> # If you _like_ free speech, then you might like to respect the
right of
> everybody here to have radical opinions on potentially life-
threatening
> experiments. I'm sure you will (as you always have done) get the
same
> respect back from others, as you give respect to them.
> # If you _dislike_ the idea of free speech, then you might like to
consider
> STOP SWEARING in block capitals on a public access news group
where, it is
> known, that many younger readers are present.
Swearing is also a part of free speech >;)
Appologies for the swearing, but I am by no means the first to swear
here. Possibly you'll like to address others that swear here too BC.
>
> Respect,
>
> Bc
>
> >Okay, let's get something straight:
> >
> >I wrote that article for EDU-******-CATIONAL PURPOSES. If people
> >can't read then that's not my problem.
> >
> >Secondly, I successfully tried what I wrote first on myself!! Now,
> >unless I'm speaking from beyond the grave... I think I'm still
alive.
> >
> >/me pinches myself.... "OUCH" I'm still here! :)
> >
> >So, can people just lay off. It gets annoying when people start to
> >question ethics!
> >
> >Milgram probably got one of the most astonishing, brilliant results
> >in the history of psychology with his study into obidiance. Now if
> >people want to question ethics, then they might aswell stick their
> >heads in the gutter coz you won't get **** done. ******.
> >
> >--- In a previous message Derek"
> ><> wrote:
> > > As an entertainer (I'm a close-up magician/paranormalist and
> > > hypnotist) I have £5 Million public liability insurance.
Despite
> > > this, there is no way I would physically mess with a persons
> >health.
> > > Derren Brown wouldn't either. So lets drop any further thoughts
> > > about the Carotid artery on anything of a similar nature. DO NOT
> >MESS
> > > WITH SOMEONE ELSES LIFE!
| Replies | Author | Yahoo ID | Date | Size |
| 4028: Stage Performance | Blue Chip | cs_bluechip | Wed 02/04/2003 | 2 KB |
| 4037: Re: Stage Performance | craigrobertlemon | craigrobertlemon | Wed 02/04/2003 | 2 KB |
| 4057: Re: Stage Performance | ekefka | ekefka | Wed 02/04/2003 | 2 KB |
| 4067: Re: Stage Performance | Blue Chip | cs_bluechip | Wed 02/04/2003 | 2 KB |
| 4030: Re: INDUCE....Ouch then urghh | Blue Chip | cs_bluechip | Wed 02/04/2003 | 2 KB |
