Derren Brown: Archive
| Message ID: 03521 | [ Previous ] [ Next ] [ Up Thread ] |
From: mrb_bailey
Date: Wed Mar 19, 2003 1:25am
Subject: Re: eye cues
One look will not do it.
http://www.manifestation.com/neurotoys/calibrate.php3
this has a nice little animation for it.
---
I stuck wires into my eyeballs and hung little mirrors of them so I
could see where my eyes were looking at all times.
Its works - almost trust me.
:)
--- In a previous message Blue Chip wrote:
> At 14:14 17/03/03 +0000, you wrote:
>
> > > They're certainly not a waste of time. But just like body
language,
> > > etc... They shouldn't be taken too seriously!
> > >
> >
> >Hi, first post to this group so hello! Just wanted to say that I
> >agree, they aren't a waste of time. Originally, a tool for therapy,
> >the eye movements helped to detect which modality (V,A or K) a
person
> >was using (both consciously and unconsciously) and so helped
improve
> >communication between therapist and client. Also, it helps to
> >identify those modalities the client associated with bad and good
> >memories/phobias/traumas etc., and this information is used to
> >overcome psychological problems. I first read about this in the
> >book 'Monsters and Magical Sticks' by Stephen Heller - an
intersting
> >read.
> >
> >Outside of therapy it's useful for telling if someone is lying (or
> >embellishing the truth :), and knowing what language to use with
them
> >(I *See*, or *Sounds* good etc...). Interestingly in the
book 'Frogs
> >into Princes', Richard Bandler alludes to a methods for making
people
> >see things that aren't quite there using this knowledge. Shame he
> >didn't elaborate...(this is the dog you're looking for - slap hand
to
> >move eyes to the upper left..., visual recall...mmm)
> >
> >Some people are dead-giveaways with the eyes. I wonder if the guy
on
> >the polygraph was one of them?
>
> LOL - the guy on the polygraph is funny. Every time he tells the
truth he
> closes his eyes and takes a long slow nod before opening them again.
>
> Remeber DB had 30 minutes of known-good analysis to pick up on
these things
> before he "got it first time, straight off"
>
>
> > Mark.
