Derren Brown: Archive
| Message ID: 02015 | [ Previous ] [ Next ] [ Up Thread ] |
From: Blue Chip
Date: Sun Dec 22, 2002 10:09am
Subject: Re: MC 2 - The ad guys....
I don't know any ad-men, so this is all guess-work, but I would suspect
that they spend (too) much time looking at what us minions find interesting
so as to draw ideas.
This said, one thing I had considered is that they would likely look where
the cameraman (also in the cab) was looking. This way DB gets to 'direct'
the clues they are desperately seeking so as to work out where this "secret
location" is.
>--- In a previous message happany wrote:
> > What does a banjo have to do with taxidermy ? Nothing.
> >
> >
> > Hehe what I mean is at one point where they showed the harp in the
>shop window, I think there was a banjo there too - there were
>certainly other items - why not choose them in the picture? Yes
>alright maybe a harp is more suitable than a banjo when it comes to a
>bear playing it in heaven (?????) but my gist is there are so many
>more things out there that could have been chosen - it was convenient
>that they chose exactly the things that were in Derren's picture....
> >
> >
> > --- In a previous message werdnajas wrote:
> > > --- In a previous message briceus2000 wrote:
> > > > You know in the bit at the end with the ad guys, well I've
> > watched
> > > it
> > > > countless times before, and I've only just noticed this. At
>the
> > > end
> > > > when they show you all of the subconscious suggestions and
>pause
> > > for
> > > > each one, they dont show you ALL of the suggestions. When they
> > go
> > > > into the building they park behind a white van, if you look
> > > closely,
> > > > on the back of the van, you can just see that someone has
> > > > written 'creature heaven' in the dust and grime by hand.
> > >
> > > I was impressed when I saw the similarities too, but when you see
> > the
> > > subconscious bits at the end - a lot of the objects are either
>very
> > > far away or are not seen by the people. there was a banjo i think
> > at
> > > one place - why not include that?
> > >
> > > The point i am getting at here is that i am not quite so sure
>that
> > > they saw and took in half of the items that were shown - i think
> > that
> > > other objects would have then been included that weren't in
> > derren's
> > > picture.
> > >
> > > Anyone agree?
>
>
>
>[e-mail address removed]>http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/info/terms.html
